Fix #27313 (see the comment) And some UI improvements: ### Before   ### After   
		
			
				
	
	
		
			87 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			CSS
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			87 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			CSS
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .ui.modal.g-modal-confirm {
 | |
|   max-width: min(800px, 90vw);
 | |
|   width: fit-content;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal.g-modal-confirm > .inside.close.icon {
 | |
|   padding: 0;
 | |
|   width: 1em;
 | |
|   height: 1em;
 | |
|   top: 1.2em;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal > .close.icon[height="16"] {
 | |
|   top: 0.7em; /* fomantic uses absolute layout, so if we have special icon size, it needs this trick to align vertically */
 | |
|   color: var(--color-text-dark);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal > .header {
 | |
|   /* can't use display:flex, because some headers have space-separated elements, eg: delete branch modal */
 | |
|   color: var(--color-text-dark);
 | |
|   background: var(--color-body);
 | |
|   border-color: var(--color-secondary);
 | |
|   border-top-left-radius: var(--border-radius);
 | |
|   border-top-right-radius: var(--border-radius);
 | |
|   vertical-align: middle;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal > .header .svg {
 | |
|   vertical-align: middle;
 | |
|   display: inline-block;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal {
 | |
|   background: var(--color-body);
 | |
|   box-shadow: 1px 3px 3px 0 var(--color-shadow), 1px 3px 15px 2px var(--color-shadow);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| /* Gitea sometimes use a form in a modal dialog, then the "positive" button could submit the form directly
 | |
| Fomantic UI only supports the layout: <div .modal><div .content/><div .actions/></div>
 | |
| However, Gitea uses the following layouts:
 | |
| * <div .modal><div .content><div .actions/></div></div>
 | |
| * <div .modal><form><div .content/><div .actions/></form></div>
 | |
| * <div .modal><div .content><form><div .actions/></form></div></div>
 | |
| * <div .modal><div .content></div><form><div .actions/></form></div>
 | |
| * ...
 | |
| These inconsistent layouts should be refactored to simple ones.
 | |
| */
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal > .content,
 | |
| .ui.modal form > .content {
 | |
|   padding: 1.5em;
 | |
|   background: var(--color-body);
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal > .actions,
 | |
| .ui.modal .content + .actions,
 | |
| .ui.modal .content + form > .actions {
 | |
|   background: var(--color-secondary-bg);
 | |
|   border-color: var(--color-secondary);
 | |
|   padding: 1rem;
 | |
|   text-align: right;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal .content > .actions {
 | |
|   padding-top: 1em; /* if the "actions" is in the "content", some paddings are already added by the "content" */
 | |
|   text-align: right;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| /* positive/negative action buttons */
 | |
| .ui.modal .actions > .ui.button {
 | |
|   display: inline-flex;
 | |
|   align-items: center;
 | |
|   padding: 10px 12px 10px 10px;
 | |
|   margin-right: 0;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal .actions > .ui.button.danger {
 | |
|   display: block;
 | |
|   width: 100%;
 | |
|   margin: 0 auto;
 | |
|   text-align: center;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .ui.modal .actions > .ui.button .svg {
 | |
|   margin-right: 5px;
 | |
| }
 |