Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
## Current webhook flow
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
## Consequences of the refactor
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
* "mail/issue/default.tmpl": the body is rendered by backend
`markdown.RenderString() HTML`, it has been already sanitized
* "repo/settings/webhook/base_list.tmpl": "Description" is prepared by
backend `ctx.Tr`, it doesn't need to be sanitized
I noticed that the code of several new webhook pages is highly
repetitive, so I pulled out the common parts to a new template, unified
reference, unified maintenance
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Fix#26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
So I found this [linter](https://github.com/Riverside-Healthcare/djlint)
which features a mode for go templates, so I gave it a try and it did
find a number of valid issue, like unbalanced tags etc. It also has a
number of bugs, I had to disable/workaround many issues.
Given that this linter is written in python, this does add a dependency
on `python` >= 3.8 and `poetry` to the development environment to be
able to run this linter locally.
- `e.g.` prefixes on placeholders are removed because the linter had a
false-positive on `placeholder="e.g. cn=Search"` for the `attr=value`
syntax and it's not ideal anyways to write `e.g.` into a placeholder
because a placeholder is meant to hold a sample value.
- In `templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl` I simplified the logic to
not conditionally create opening tags without closing tags because this
stuff confuses the linter (and possibly the reader as well).
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
Some of those are still Copy&Paste problems.
This PR:
* Only cleans the legacy incorrect code, doesn't change or improve the
"action" logic.
* Remove the redundant `$('.toggle.button').on('click')`, now
`$('.show-panel.button').on('click')` handles that kinds of buttons
Actually, there is only one correct "toggle button" in code, the one on
the webhook page.
No need to backport.
Follow:
* #23574
* Remove all ".tooltip[data-content=...]"
Major changes:
* Remove "tooltip" class, use "[data-tooltip-content=...]" instead of
".tooltip[data-content=...]"
* Remove legacy `data-position`, it's dead code since last Fomantic
Tooltip -> Tippy Tooltip refactoring
* Rename reaction attribute from `data-content` to
`data-reaction-content`
* Add comments for some `data-content`: `{{/* used by the form */}}`
* Remove empty "ui" class
* Use "text color" for SVG icons (a few)
This improves a lot of accessibility shortcomings.
Every possible instance of `<div class="button">` matching the command
`ag '<[^ab].*?class=.*?[" ]button[ "]' templates/ | grep -v 'dropdown'`
has been converted when possible.
divs with the `dropdown` class and their children were omitted as
1. more analysis must be conducted whether the dropdowns still work as
intended when they are a `button` instead of a `div`.
2. most dropdowns have `div`s as children. The HTML standard disallows
`div`s inside `button`s.
3. When a dropdown child that's part of the displayed text content is
converted to a `button`, the dropdown can be focused twice
Further changes include that all "gitea-managed" buttons with JS code
received an `e.preventDefault()` so that they don't accidentally submit
an underlying form, which would execute instead of cancel the action.
Lastly, some minor issues were fixed as well during the refactoring.
## Future improvements
As mentioned in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23337#discussion_r1127277391,
`<a>`s without `href` attribute are not focusable.
They should later on be converted to `<button>`s.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Close#22847
This PR:
* introduce Gitea's own `showElem` and related functions
* remove jQuery show/hide
* remove .hide class
* remove inline style=display:none
From now on:
do not use:
* "[hidden]" attribute: it's too weak, can not be applied to an element
with "display: flex"
* ".hidden" class: it has been polluted by Fomantic UI in many cases
* inline style="display: none": it's difficult to tweak
* jQuery's show/hide/toggle: it can not show/hide elements with
"display: xxx !important"
only use:
* this ".gt-hidden" class
* showElem/hideElem/toggleElem functions in "utils/dom.js"
cc: @silverwind , this is the all-in-one PR
As discussed in #22847 the helpers in helpers.less need to have a
separate prefix as they are causing conflicts with fomantic styles
This will allow us to have the `.gt-hidden { display:none !important; }`
style that is needed to for the reverted PR.
Of note in doing this I have noticed that there was already a conflict
with at least one chroma style which this PR now avoids.
I've also added in the `gt-hidden` style that matches the tailwind one
and switched the code that needed it to use that.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fomantic-UI's `.hidden` CSS class is badly designed.
* Checkbox elements do not need it in HTML, so this PR removes it (JS
adds the `.hidden` class back by `$('.ui.checkbox').checkbox()`)
* `menu transaction hidden` is still needed, and it should be the only
usage for the `.hidden` from now on (until they get refactored properly)
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
- Fix regression from #21893 which had misaligned a few tables like repo
lists and e-mails
- Bring githooks list in line with webhooks list for styling
- Change webhook list icons to just colored dots, like githook list
- Increase size of dot in webhook and githook list from 16 to 22px
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_
## Context
In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:
- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)
## Proposed solution
Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).
This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.
As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):
The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.
## Questions
- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~
## Done as well:
- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there
_Closes #19872_
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Although the `.i18n` has been refactored to `.locale`, some PRs using
`.i18n` were still merged.
* #20219
* #21246
This PR fixes the calls to `.i18n`.
At the moment, `{{.nosuch.nosuch "..."}}` won't cause template error so
these mistakes don't cause 500 and haven't been found.
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.
This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.
The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.
When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.
I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).
Fix#16457
Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
* Refactor `i18n` to `locale`
- Currently we're using the `i18n` variable naming for the `locale`
struct. This contains locale's specific information and cannot be used
for general i18n purpose, therefore refactoring it to `locale` makes
more sense.
- Ref: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/20096#discussion_r906699200
* Update routers/install/install.go
