githaven-fork/tests/integration/api_repo_file_update_test.go

276 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package integration
import (
stdCtx "context"
"encoding/base64"
"fmt"
"net/http"
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
"net/url"
"path/filepath"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/gitrepo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func getUpdateFileOptions() *api.UpdateFileOptions {
content := "This is updated text"
contentEncoded := base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(content))
return &api.UpdateFileOptions{
DeleteFileOptions: api.DeleteFileOptions{
FileOptions: api.FileOptions{
BranchName: "master",
NewBranchName: "master",
Message: "My update of new/file.txt",
Author: api.Identity{
Name: "John Doe",
Email: "johndoe@example.com",
},
Committer: api.Identity{
Name: "Anne Doe",
Email: "annedoe@example.com",
},
},
SHA: "103ff9234cefeee5ec5361d22b49fbb04d385885",
},
ContentBase64: contentEncoded,
}
}
func getExpectedFileResponseForUpdate(commitID, treePath, lastCommitSHA string) *api.FileResponse {
sha := "08bd14b2e2852529157324de9c226b3364e76136"
encoding := "base64"
content := "VGhpcyBpcyB1cGRhdGVkIHRleHQ="
selfURL := setting.AppURL + "api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/contents/" + treePath + "?ref=master"
htmlURL := setting.AppURL + "user2/repo1/src/branch/master/" + treePath
gitURL := setting.AppURL + "api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/git/blobs/" + sha
downloadURL := setting.AppURL + "user2/repo1/raw/branch/master/" + treePath
return &api.FileResponse{
Content: &api.ContentsResponse{
Name: filepath.Base(treePath),
Path: treePath,
SHA: sha,
LastCommitSHA: lastCommitSHA,
Type: "file",
Size: 20,
Encoding: &encoding,
Content: &content,
URL: &selfURL,
HTMLURL: &htmlURL,
GitURL: &gitURL,
DownloadURL: &downloadURL,
Links: &api.FileLinksResponse{
Self: &selfURL,
GitURL: &gitURL,
HTMLURL: &htmlURL,
},
},
Commit: &api.FileCommitResponse{
CommitMeta: api.CommitMeta{
URL: setting.AppURL + "api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/git/commits/" + commitID,
SHA: commitID,
},
HTMLURL: setting.AppURL + "user2/repo1/commit/" + commitID,
Author: &api.CommitUser{
Identity: api.Identity{
Name: "John Doe",
Email: "johndoe@example.com",
},
},
Committer: &api.CommitUser{
Identity: api.Identity{
Name: "Anne Doe",
Email: "annedoe@example.com",
},
},
Message: "My update of README.md\n",
},
Verification: &api.PayloadCommitVerification{
Verified: false,
Sign merges, CRUD, Wiki and Repository initialisation with gpg key (#7631) This PR fixes #7598 by providing a configurable way of signing commits across the Gitea instance. Per repository configurability and import/generation of trusted secure keys is not provided by this PR - from a security PoV that's probably impossible to do properly. Similarly web-signing, that is asking the user to sign something, is not implemented - this could be done at a later stage however. ## Features - [x] If commit.gpgsign is set in .gitconfig sign commits and files created through repofiles. (merges should already have been signed.) - [x] Verify commits signed with the default gpg as valid - [x] Signer, Committer and Author can all be different - [x] Allow signer to be arbitrarily different - We still require the key to have an activated email on Gitea. A more complete implementation would be to use a keyserver and mark external-or-unactivated with an "unknown" trust level icon. - [x] Add a signing-key.gpg endpoint to get the default gpg pub key if available - Rather than add a fake web-flow user I've added this as an endpoint on /api/v1/signing-key.gpg - [x] Try to match the default key with a user on gitea - this is done at verification time - [x] Make things configurable? - app.ini configuration done - [x] when checking commits are signed need to check if they're actually verifiable too - [x] Add documentation I have decided that adjusting the docker to create a default gpg key is not the correct thing to do and therefore have not implemented this.
2019-10-16 13:42:42 +00:00
Reason: "gpg.error.not_signed_commit",
Signature: "",
Payload: "",
},
}
}
func TestAPIUpdateFile(t *testing.T) {
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2}) // owner of the repo1 & repo16
org3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 3}) // owner of the repo3, is an org
user4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 4}) // owner of neither repos
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1}) // public repo
repo3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 3}) // public repo
repo16 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 16}) // private repo
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
fileID := 0
// Get user2's token
session := loginUser(t, user2.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 18:57:16 +00:00
token2 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Get user4's token
session = loginUser(t, user4.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 18:57:16 +00:00
token4 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test updating a file in repo1 which user2 owns, try both with branch and empty branch
for _, branch := range [...]string{
"master", // Branch
"", // Empty branch
} {
fileID++
treePath := fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
updateFileOptions := getUpdateFileOptions()
updateFileOptions.BranchName = branch
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
gitRepo, _ := gitrepo.OpenRepository(stdCtx.Background(), repo1)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
commitID, _ := gitRepo.GetBranchCommitID(updateFileOptions.NewBranchName)
lasCommit, _ := gitRepo.GetCommitByPath(treePath)
expectedFileResponse := getExpectedFileResponseForUpdate(commitID, treePath, lasCommit.ID.String())
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
var fileResponse api.FileResponse
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &fileResponse)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedFileResponse.Content, fileResponse.Content)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedFileResponse.Commit.SHA, fileResponse.Commit.SHA)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedFileResponse.Commit.HTMLURL, fileResponse.Commit.HTMLURL)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedFileResponse.Commit.Author.Email, fileResponse.Commit.Author.Email)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedFileResponse.Commit.Author.Name, fileResponse.Commit.Author.Name)
gitRepo.Close()
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
}
// Test updating a file in a new branch
updateFileOptions := getUpdateFileOptions()
updateFileOptions.BranchName = repo1.DefaultBranch
updateFileOptions.NewBranchName = "new_branch"
fileID++
treePath := fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var fileResponse api.FileResponse
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &fileResponse)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
expectedSHA := "08bd14b2e2852529157324de9c226b3364e76136"
expectedHTMLURL := fmt.Sprintf(setting.AppURL+"user2/repo1/src/branch/new_branch/update/file%d.txt", fileID)
expectedDownloadURL := fmt.Sprintf(setting.AppURL+"user2/repo1/raw/branch/new_branch/update/file%d.txt", fileID)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedSHA, fileResponse.Content.SHA)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedHTMLURL, *fileResponse.Content.HTMLURL)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedDownloadURL, *fileResponse.Content.DownloadURL)
assert.EqualValues(t, updateFileOptions.Message+"\n", fileResponse.Commit.Message)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test updating a file and renaming it
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
updateFileOptions.BranchName = repo1.DefaultBranch
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
updateFileOptions.FromPath = treePath
treePath = "rename/" + treePath
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &fileResponse)
expectedSHA = "08bd14b2e2852529157324de9c226b3364e76136"
expectedHTMLURL = fmt.Sprintf(setting.AppURL+"user2/repo1/src/branch/master/rename/update/file%d.txt", fileID)
expectedDownloadURL = fmt.Sprintf(setting.AppURL+"user2/repo1/raw/branch/master/rename/update/file%d.txt", fileID)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedSHA, fileResponse.Content.SHA)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedHTMLURL, *fileResponse.Content.HTMLURL)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedDownloadURL, *fileResponse.Content.DownloadURL)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test updating a file without a message
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
updateFileOptions.Message = ""
updateFileOptions.BranchName = repo1.DefaultBranch
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &fileResponse)
expectedMessage := "Update " + treePath + "\n"
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedMessage, fileResponse.Commit.Message)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test updating a file with the wrong SHA
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
correctSHA := updateFileOptions.SHA
updateFileOptions.SHA = "badsha"
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
expectedAPIError := context.APIError{
Message: "sha does not match [given: " + updateFileOptions.SHA + ", expected: " + correctSHA + "]",
2019-06-12 21:07:24 +00:00
URL: setting.API.SwaggerURL,
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
}
var apiError context.APIError
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiError)
assert.Equal(t, expectedAPIError, apiError)
// Test creating a file in repo1 by user4 who does not have write access
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo16, treePath)
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo16.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token4)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Tests a repo with no token given so will fail
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo16, treePath)
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo16.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test using access token for a private repo that the user of the token owns
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo16, treePath)
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo16.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test using org repo "org3/repo3" where user2 is a collaborator
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(org3, repo3, treePath)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", org3.Name, repo3.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token2)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test using org repo "org3/repo3" with no user token
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(org3, repo3, treePath)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", org3.Name, repo3.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
// Test using repo "user2/repo1" where user4 is a NOT collaborator
fileID++
treePath = fmt.Sprintf("update/file%d.txt", fileID)
createFile(user2, repo1, treePath)
updateFileOptions = getUpdateFileOptions()
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PUT", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/contents/%s", user2.Name, repo1.Name, treePath), &updateFileOptions).
AddTokenAuth(token4)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
2019-05-11 15:29:17 +00:00
})
}